The latest thinking and expert insights into the insurance industry.
04 October 2016

Insurance aggregators: the race to the bottom price only has losers

Insurers and aggregators are to some extent competitors and they always will be. However, both have an obvious mutual interest in maintaining a healthy insurance market. Christian van Leeuwen gives a rundown of the developments and, on the whole, sees win-win opportunities.

Comparison is here to stay

Blank tag tied with brown string. Price tag, gift tag, sale tag, address label, etc.

Nowadays, it is impossible to imagine a world without comparison websites for consumers. This also applies to the insurance industry. Price will always be an important factor when making purchase decisions. Whether it is a new fridge, a holiday or an insurance policy, nobody wants to pay too much.

In our industry, aggregators in particular focus on insurances that require little advice and where comparison can simply be based on price. These policies mainly concern health and P&C products such as vehicles, travel and home, whereas, for example, disability insurances are less suitable.

If we take a look at the developments in this field, we see different types of aggregators:

  • Comparison only – the site is paid for referrals;
  • Comparison and intermediary – the main business is selling policies;
  • Owned by insurer – an independent site that (mainly) compares its own labels;
  • Comparison module on the site of insurer – keeps (potential) clients on the insurer’s own site, but offers the option of comparison.

Global differences

The aggregator market shows huge differences per country. This is mainly due to the internet availability in a region and the possibility of taking out insurance policies online. Besides, insurers need to be willing to publicize their prices.

In the UNews thumb EventsK the aggregator market is enormous: it accounts for around 70% of the premium income. This means there is a lot of competition and an aggressive mergers and acquisitions policy.
However, in the US, insurance companies have decided to keep acquisition in their own hands. This makes setting up aggregators more difficult. Besides, they also have to deal with different rules and regulations across various states. In comparison, the Netherlands stands somewhere in between. There are various aggregators of which Independer is market leader. However, Independer is a combination of an aggregator and intermediary and is owned by an insurer.

Exponential growth

In general, it continues to be a turbulent market in which new parties regularly appear or successful parties quite literally cross the borders to other countries and regions – both with varying success. Analyst Celent has seen a 400%-growth of the market over the past four years. In a recent report Accenture signals an increase in the number of products, such as pet insurances and other relatively simple products.

Whose client is it?

This is an interesting question; both aggregators and insurers consider the consumer who takes out a policy with them as their client. While insurers thrive on retention and continuity, aggregators do not really appear to have an eye for this. Aggregators focus on the drivers that are important to the consumer, in particular price. By only opting for the lowest price, a consumer might eventually harm his own interest. The coverage and conditions may not suffice.

Adverse consequences


In the name of client interest, aggregators and insurers primarily seem to regard each other as rivals. When it is time for renewal, aggregators approach the client again with the option that is cheapest at that moment. Insurers on the other hand often perceive traffic coming from aggregators as expensive and not very reliable.

For the consumer disappointment and annoyance lurk when it finally comes to taking out the policy and the conditions, coverage or even price turn out to be different than expected. And neither party benefits from disappointed clients. In addition, insurers feel pressure to take higher risks to bring down their prices. It conflicts with the need for healthy and profitable product portfolios.

As aggregators offer more anonymity, it is easier and more tempting for consumers to provide untruthful information. This leads to an increase in the number of fraud cases with insurance applications.

Everyone a winner

We can conclude that the need for transparency and comparison will remain. Focusing on short-term advantages turns out disadvantageous for all parties in the long run. So how can we optimize the benefits for all parties: for the insurer, the aggregator and the client?

I believe the answer lies in more cooperation on the following four points:

  1. Preselection of the risk – the aggregator focuses more on which client best matches which profile of which insurer. This increases the acceptance rate. Meaning the aggregator will have more satisfied clients and the insurer is more willing to pay the relatively high provision. Of course, the level of preselection should be in line with the current privacy laws.
  2. Bringing administrative processes into line – insurers are increasingly automating and digitizing their processes. Closer collaboration with aggregators can lead to transferring information that has already been filled in. The client does not have to do this over and over again. This saves time and prevents mistakes.
  3. Reward retention – the aggregator can take a look at different factors than price which might be important for the client. By doing this it may come with an attractive offer in collaboration with the current insurer. The premium might be a bit higher, but include a reward for the continuation of the relation in the form of a lower own risk or more extensive coverage.
  4. Fraud prevention – at FRISS we see a lot of fraud arise at the beginning of the application and underwriting process; consumers trying out various variables to see if the premium can be brought down even further. An aggregator can signal this behavior. If, for example, someone suddenly changes the region or claims history, while thaking out an insurance it may indicate misuse. The strength of aggregators is that they have a broader insight into the behavior of an applicant. This is usefull to reduce risks and misuse.


Insurers and aggregators don’t always have the same interests. Although in the end everyone – even the client – benefits from a healthy insurance market. It would be great if the parties could agree that cooperation in certain fields indeed is beneficial to everyone. Work together where possible and separate where necessary.

Contact us

Cookie and Privacy Policy

1. Introduction

When you use this website, FRISS may collect information about your use of the website and the content offered. We believe it is important to handle your (personal) data with due care and confidentiality. When processing your personal data, we comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (Algemene Verordening Gegevensbescherming) and Article 11.7a of the Telecommunications Act (Telecommunicatiewet).

1.1.  Controller

The controller of the processing of personal data is:

FRISS Fraudebestrijding B.V.
Orteliuslaan 15
3528 BA

This processing of personal data is registered with the Dutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens) in The Hague under reporting number m00004997.

1.2.  Purposes of data processing

There are several places on our website where you can fill in your (personal) data. We will explain the purposes of the various instances of data processing below.

Filling in the contact form or sending an e-mail

If you fill in the contact form on our website or send us an e-mail, we will only use the (personal) data you provide for the purpose or purposes for which you filled in the contact form or sent the e-mail.

Download form

If you download files on our website (such as e-books, whitepapers or reports), we will use the (personal) data you provide for one or more of the following purposes:

  • for the execution of an agreement, for example to send you the e-book, whitepaper or report you have chosen;
  • for the formation of an agreement, for example by contacting you by telephone or in writing.


If you fill in the application form for the newsletter on our website, your (personal) data will be used to send you the newsletter. Each newsletter contains a hyperlink at the bottom of the message that you can use to unsubscribe.

In addition to the personal data you provide to FRISS yourself, FRISS may collect, record and process additional (personal) data if you use the (web) services of FRISS. This concerns the following personal data:

  • data from the used equipment, such as a unique device ID, version of the operating system and settings of the device you use to access a service;
  • information about the use of a service, such as the time at which you use the service and the type of service that is used;
  • location details from your device or derived from your IP address that is provided to us when you use a particular service;
  • data available from external sources. We may receive information about you from public or commercially available sources.

1.3.  Provision of (personal) data to third parties

Your (personal) data will never be provided to third parties without your permission, unless we have an obligation to do so pursuant to legislation or regulations or you have given permission for this.

1.4.  Security of data

FRISS respects your privacy and ensures that personal data are handled confidentially and with the utmost care. All processed (personal) data is stored exclusively in secure databases. These databases are only accessible to employees of FRISS, to the extent that this access is required by virtue of their position. FRISS makes every effort to secure these systems against loss and/or any form of unlawful use or processing.

1.5.  Inspection, correction and deletion of data and the right to object

You can view your data that is processed by FRISS at any time and free of charge and, if you so wish, modify this data or have it deleted. You can also object to receiving information about products, services or content of FRISS. If you wish to make use of one of these options, you can send an e-mail to the Data Protection Officer of FRISS via privacy@friss.eu or write to the following address:

FRISS | fraud, risk & compliance
Attn. Data Protection Officer
Orteliuslaan 15
3528 BA Utrecht.

2. Cookies

When using this website, information about your use of these services and other websites may be collected by or on behalf of FRISS, for example by means of cookies.

A cookie is a small file that is sent along with pages of a website and stored by your browser on the hard disk of your computer. We use cookies to remember settings and preferences. You can disable these cookies via your browser.

2.1.  The purposes for which FRISS uses cookies

On our website we use cookies for the following purposes:

  • for statistical purposes, in order to analyse the use of FRISS websites. This allows us to keep track of the number of visitors and see which parts of our website are popular. We use Google Analytics in order to track and consult these statistics. On this website you can find explanations about all cookies that may be placed by Google;
  • for what is known as ‘targeting’ purposes, if you have used the download form. By targeting we mean building a profile of you based on your surfing behaviour on our website, after which we may contact you by telephone or e-mail based on the interests you have shown in order to offer you FRISS services that you may be interested in. We use HubSpot in order to track and consult these statistics. On this website you can find explanations about all cookies that may be placed by HubSpot;

3. Changes to this Cookie and Privacy Statement

FRISS may make changes to this Cookie and Privacy Statement. All modifications will be published on this page. We advise you to consult this Cookie and Privacy Statement regularly, so that you are always aware of the content of the current Cookie and Privacy Statement.